Hayes v. Rayford et al
| Abraham Bundu Hayes |
| Phonso Rayford and Jesus Avalos |
| 2:2021cv00244 |
| October 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Jason B Libby |
| Nelva Gonzales Ramos |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
RECEIPT of Transfer Letter re: transfer of case to Western District of Texas. New Case # assigned: 5:21cv01039 and received on 10/26/2021., filed. (notified by email) (MarcelleLaBee, 4)
|
|
Filing 5
OPINION AND ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE to US District Court for the Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division; all pending motions are DENIED as moot.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Jason B Libby) Parties notified.(RochelleLimon, 2)
|
|
Interdistrict transfer to US District Court for the Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division. Case transferred electronically. Case terminated on 10/26/2021, filed. (RochelleLimon, 2)
|
|
Filing 4
CLERKS NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING as to Abraham Bundu Hayes. Parties notified Notice of Compliance due by 11/15/2021, filed. (NicoleTirado, 2)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Exclusion, filed. (NicoleTirado, 2)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (NicoleTirado, 2)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Abraham Bundu Hayes. (Attachments: #1 Attachments, #2 Envelope)(NicoleTirado, 2)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
