Gaona v. Rayford
Valentin Gaona |
TDCJ, Director Bobby Lumpkin |
2:2021cv00266 |
November 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Julie K Hampton |
Nelva Gonzales Ramos |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Motion(s) terminated: #9 MOTION Petition for Development of Factual Record. See D.E. #10 OPINION AND ORDER denying #8 Motion to Appoint Counsel and denying #9 Petition for Development of Factual Record Motions.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie K Hampton) Parties notified.(RochelleLimon, 2) |
Filing 10 OPINION AND ORDER denying #8 Motion to Appoint Counsel and denying #9 Petition for Development of Factual Record Motions.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie K. Hampton) Parties notified.(RochelleLimon, 2). |
Filing 9 Petition for Development of Factual Record Motions referred to Julie K Hampton by Valentin Gaona, filed. Motion Docket Date 1/13/2022. (Attachments: #1 Motion for Leave to File, #2 Envelope)(NeldaGarcia, 2) Modified on 12/23/2021 (NeldaGarcia, 2). |
Filing 8 MOTION for Appointment of Additional Counsel Motions referred to Julie K Hampton. by Valentin Gaona, filed. Motion Docket Date 1/13/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Envelope)(NeldaGarcia, 2). |
Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time; Motion-related deadline set re: #6 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer. Responses due by 1/28/2022..(Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie K Hampton) Parties notified.(MaraGonzales, 2) |
Filing 6 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File AnswerMotions referred to Julie K Hampton. by Bobby Lumpkin, filed. Motion Docket Date 1/12/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Wawrzynski, Stephanie) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephanie Wawrzynski on behalf of Bobby Lumpkin, filed. (Wawrzynski, Stephanie) |
Filing 4 ORDER FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS(Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie K Hampton) (Attachments: #1 DE 1 Petition) Parties notified.(amireles, 2) |
Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (NeldaGarcia, 2) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Exclusion, filed. (NeldaGarcia, 2) |
Writ of Habeas Corpus Filing fee: $5.00 re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus,, receipt number CC017589, filed. (NeldaGarcia, 2) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5) filed by Valentin Gaona. (Attachments: #1 Continuation, #2 Envelope)(NeldaGarcia, 2) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/12/2021: #3 Continuation request to pay) (NeldaGarcia, 2). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Gaona v. Rayford | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Valentin Gaona | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: TDCJ, Director Bobby Lumpkin | |
Represented By: | Edward Larry Marshall |
Represented By: | Stephanie Nichole Wawrzynski |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.