Diagnostic Affiliates of Northeast v. 90 Degree Benefit, Inc.
Plaintiff: d/b/a 24 Hour Covid Diagnostic Affiliates of Northeast and Diagnostic Affiliates of Northeast Hou, LLC doing business as 24 Hour COVIDRT-PCR Laboratory
Defendant: 90 Degree Benefit, Inc. and 90 Degree Benefits, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2022cv00013
Filed: January 25, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: David S Morales
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 12, 2022 Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by 90 Degree Benefits, Inc., filed.(Harrison, Katherine)
February 22, 2022 Filing 7 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to 90 Degree Benefits, Inc. served on 2/19/2022, answer due 3/14/2022, filed.(Ebad, Khan)
February 10, 2022 Filing 6 First CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Diagnostic Affiliates of Northeast Hou, LLC, filed.(Ebad, Khan)
February 9, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE of Change of Address by Ebad Khan, counsel for Diagnostic Affiliates of Northeast Hou, LLC, filed. (Ebad, Khan)
January 27, 2022 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Diagnostic Affiliates of Northeast Hou, LLC. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(ChristinaAvila, 2)
January 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference set for 4/12/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge David S Morales(Signed by Judge David S Morales) Parties notified.(arodriguez, 2)
January 26, 2022 Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to All Defendants, filed.(Khan, Ebadullah)
January 25, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-27654449) filed by d/b/a 24 Hour Covid Diagnostic Affiliates of Northeast. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(Khan, Ebadullah)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Diagnostic Affiliates of Northeast v. 90 Degree Benefit, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: d/b/a 24 Hour Covid Diagnostic Affiliates of Northeast
Represented By: Ebadullah Khan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Diagnostic Affiliates of Northeast Hou, LLC doing business as 24 Hour COVIDRT-PCR Laboratory
Represented By: Khan Ebad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 90 Degree Benefit, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 90 Degree Benefits, Inc.
Represented By: Chad L Farrar
Represented By: Katherine P Harrison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?