Cao v. FedEx Freight, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Trish Cao
Defendant: FedEx Freight, Inc., FedEx Ground Package System Inc and John Doe
Case Number: 2:2022cv00246
Filed: October 24, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Nelva Gonzales Ramos
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 27, 2022 Intradistrict Transfer to Houston Division, filed. (NeldaGarcia, 2)
October 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #3 Motion to Change Venue to Southern District of Texas Houston Division.(Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(NeldaGarcia, 2)
October 26, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION to Change Venue to Houston by FedEx Freight, Inc., filed. Motion Docket Date 11/16/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Socks, Harold)
October 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 1/12/2023 at 09:00 AM before Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos(Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(SashaOzuna, 2)
October 24, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Harris County 270th District Court, case number 2022-59071 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-28970850) filed by FedEx Freight, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Original Petition, #2 Exhibit First Amended Petition, #3 Exhibit Second Amended Petition, #4 Exhibit Citation w.Return FXF, #5 Exhibit Citation w.Return FXG, #6 Exhibit Consent to Removal, #7 Exhibit Notice of Removal - State, #8 Exhibit Affidavit in Support of Removal, #9 Exhibit FXG Citizenship Docs, #10 Exhibit Docket Sheet, #11 Exhibit Civil Process Request - FXF, #12 Exhibit Civil Process Request - FXG, #13 Exhibit List of All Counsel of Record, #14 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Socks, Harold)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cao v. FedEx Freight, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Trish Cao
Represented By: Robert A McAllister, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FedEx Freight, Inc.
Represented By: Harold Louis Socks
Represented By: Noemi Vania Lopez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FedEx Ground Package System Inc
Represented By: Daniel Ryan Erwin
Represented By: Peter Carl Blomquist
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Represented By: Peter Carl Blomquist
Represented By: Daniel Ryan Erwin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?