Marsh v. Nueces County Jail et al
Brandon Marsh |
Nueces County Jail, Sheriff J.C. Hooper and Adolpho Riojas |
2:2022cv00263 |
November 10, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Julie K Hampton |
Nelva Gonzales Ramos |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 9 MOTION Requesting Change of Mailing Address( Motion Docket Date 1/9/2023.), MOTION for Appointment of CounselMotions referred to Julie K Hampton. by Brandon Marsh, filed. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (MaraGonzales, 2) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 6 CLERKS NOTICE of Exclusion, filed. (amireles, 2) |
Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (amireles, 2) |
Filing 4 Letter from Brandon Marsh re: mailing correspondence, filed. (amireles, 2) |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Brandon Marsh, filed. (amireles, 2) |
Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma PauperisMotions referred to Julie K Hampton. by Brandon Marsh, filed. Motion Docket Date 12/1/2022. (Attachments: #1 AO 240)(amireles, 2) |
Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against J.C. Hooper, Nueces County Jail, Adolpho Riojas (Filing fee $ 402) filed by Brandon Marsh. (Attachments: #1 Attachments, #2 Envelope)(amireles, 2) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.