Gonzalez v. Herrman et al
Priscilla Gonzalez |
Gregory Hampton Herrman and Herrman & Herrman PLLC |
2:2022cv00282 |
November 30, 2022 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
David S Morales |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 NOTICE of Setting. Parties notified. Pre-Motion Conference set by Zoom for 11/8/2023 at 09:45 AM before Judge David S Morales, filed. (ArleneRodriguez, 2) |
Filing 29 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Priscilla Gonzalez re: #20 Order on Motion for Leave to File, filed. An updated address could not be found. (AaronJackson, 4) |
Filing 28 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Priscilla Gonzalez re: #24 Scheduling Order ADI - FORM - NGR, filed. (AndyGould, 3) Modified on 8/18/2023 (AaronJackson, 4). |
Filing 27 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Priscilla Gonzalez re: #24 Scheduling Order ADI - FORM - NGR, filed. An updated address could not be found. (AaronJackson, 4). |
Filing 26 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Priscilla Gonzalez re: #13 Order on Motion to Dismiss, filed. (fcarbia, 2) |
Filing 25 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Priscilla Gonzalez re: #18 Order,, filed. (HeatherCarr, 4) |
![]() |
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge David S Morales. INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE held on 7/13/2023. The parties appeared by Zoom. The Court has reviewed the parties case management plan and proposes an extension of 90 days to those deadlines. The Court will enter a scheduling order today. The plaintiff is proceeding pro se. Plaintiff has contacted law firms seeking representation, however, she has found none. The Court confirms with the plaintiff that the amended complaint contains all of her claims. Should she need to add any new claims, she must seek leave of the court. Defense intends to file a motion for summary judgment. Appearances:Priscilla Gonzalez, Pro Se. Christopher J Gale f/defendant.(Digital # 10:00 - 10:15)(ERO: Sasha Ozuna), filed.(arodriguez, 2) |
Filing 23 ANSWER to #21 Amended Complaint/Counterclaim/Crossclaim etc. with Jury Demand by Herrman & Herrman PLLC, filed.(Gale, Christopher) |
Filing 22 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Priscilla Gonzalez re: #17 Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim,, filed. (HeatherCarr, 4) |
Filing 21 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Herrman & Herrman PLLC filed by Priscilla Gonzalez.(vrios, 2) |
![]() |
***Set/Reset Hearings: Initial Pretrial Conference set by Zoom for 7/13/2023 at 10:00 AM before Judge David S Morales (arodriguez, 2) |
Filing 19 RESPONSE to #15 MOTION for Leave to File to File Amended Complaint filed by Herrman & Herrman PLLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Charge of Discrimination, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Charge of Discrimination, #3 Proposed Order DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT)(Gale, Christopher) |
![]() |
![]() |
Show Cause setting is terminated. (arodriguez, 2) |
Filing 16 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Herrman & Herrman PLLC, filed. Motion Docket Date 5/30/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Proposed Order GRANTING DEFENDANTS RULE 12 MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS AMENDED COMPLAINT)(Gale, Christopher) |
Filing 15 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint by Priscilla Gonzalez, filed. Motion Docket Date 5/16/2023. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(ChristinaAvila, 2) |
Filing 14 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint by Priscilla Gonzalez, filed. Motion Docket Date 5/15/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(ChristinaAvila, 2) |
![]() |
4/20/23 Initial Pretrial Conference is terminated. (arodriguez, 2) |
![]() |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Setting. Parties notified. Initial Pretrial & Scheduling Conference set for 3/15/2023 at 10:00 AM before Judge David S Morales, filed. (arodriguez, 2) |
Filing 10 Joint JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by Gregory Hampton Herrman, Herrman & Herrman PLLC, filed.(Gale, Christopher) |
Filing 9 REPLY to Response to #7 MOTION to Dismiss , filed by Gregory Hampton Herrman, Herrman & Herrman PLLC. (Gale, Christopher) |
Filing 8 PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE to Defendant's #7 MOTION to Dismiss Request To Amend Origianl Complaint filed by Priscilla Gonzalez. (JaredMarks, 2) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss by Gregory Hampton Herrman, Herrman & Herrman PLLC, filed. Motion Docket Date 2/1/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Charge of Discrimination, #2 Exhibit B - SOS Filing, #3 Exhibit C - SOS Filing, #4 Exhibit D - Notice of Charge of Discrimination)(Gale, Christopher) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Gregory Hampton Herrman, Herrman & Herrman PLLC, filed.(Gale, Christopher) |
Filing 5 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Gregory Hampton Herrman served on 12/21/2022, answer due 1/11/2023, filed.(vrios, 2) |
Summonses Re-Issued as to Priscilla Gonzalez. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff in person. To be picked up in our office., filed.(amireles, 2) |
![]() |
Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (amireles, 2) |
Summonses Issued (2 blank). Issued summonses delivered to plaintiff by First-class mail, filed.(amireles, 2) |
![]() |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Gregory Hampton Herrman, Herrman & Herrman PLLC filed by Priscilla Gonzalez. (Attachments: #1 Supplement, #2 Exhibits, #3 Notice of Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons, #4 Waiver of the Service of Summons, #5 Summons)(amireles, 2) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.