Campbell v. Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| Kimberly Campbell |
| Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
| Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel |
| 2:2023cv00288 |
| November 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Mitchel Neurock |
| Nelva Gonzales Ramos |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to repond to Plaintiff's complaintMotions referred to Mitchel Neurock. by Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration, filed. Motion Docket Date 1/26/2024. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order proposed order)(Kemp, Kerry) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Kerry Kemp on behalf of Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration, filed. (Kemp, Kerry) |
| Filing 2 CLERKS NOTICE of Exclusion, filed. (ChristinaAvila, 2) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration (Commissioner of SSA and U.S. Attorney served by NEF at the designated email addresses.) IFP granted in case 23mc175 on 11.9.23 by Judge Jason B Libby. filed by Kimberly Campbell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ChristinaAvila, 2) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
