Thomas v. Ogg et al
| Ronald Thomas |
| Kim Ogg, Ken Paxton, Molly Wurzer, Joseph M Sanchez and Gregg Abott |
| 2:2023cv00321 |
| December 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Mitchel Neurock |
| Nelva Gonzales Ramos |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying #4 Motion to Appoint.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Mitchel Neurock) Parties notified. Copy mailed to TDCJ, Huntsville, TX. (AngelMireles, 2)
|
| Filing 6 CLERKS NOTICE of Exclusion, filed. (MaraGonzales, 2) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (MaraGonzales, 2) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Ronald Thomas, filed. Motions referred to Mitchel Neurock. Motion Docket Date 12/27/2023. (MaraGonzales, 2) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Ronald Thomas, filed. (MaraGonzales, 2) |
| Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Ronald Thomas, filed. Motions referred to Mitchel Neurock. Motion Docket Date 12/22/2023. (MaraGonzales, 2) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 405) filed by Ronald Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Verified Complaint for Declaratory and Injuctive Relief)(MaraGonzales, 2) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
