Pelko v. Perales et al
| John Douglas Pelko and John D Pelko |
| Perales and Ms Villareal |
| 2:2024cv00004 |
| January 5, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Julie K Hampton |
| Jason B Libby |
| David S Morales |
| Nelva Gonzales Ramos |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 ***DISREGARD -- DOCKETED IN ERROR***ORDER granting #2 Motion (AnnSalazar, 2). |
Filing 6
ORDER TO CONSOLIDATE CASES: Lead Case No. 2:23-cv-339 and Member Case No. 2:24-cv-4 (Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie K Hampton) Parties notified.(MaraGonzales, 2)
|
| Filing 5 Addendum to #1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT by John Douglas Pelko, filed. (Attachments: #1 Cover Page, #2 Envelope)(MGonzales, 2) |
| Filing 4 CLERKS NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING as to John Douglas Pelko. Parties notified Notice of Compliance due by 2/5/2024, filed. (Attachments: #1 IFP) (MGonzales, 2) |
| Filing 3 CLERKS NOTICE of Exclusion, filed. (MGonzales, 2) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (MGonzales, 2) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against Officer Perales, Ms. Villareal (Filing fee $ 405) filed by John Douglas Pelko.(MGonzales, 2) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
