Cavazos v. Mira Bahia Corpus Christi LP, et al
| Daniel Cavazos |
| MIRA BAHIA CORPUS CHRISTI LP, PROPORTIONAL PROSPERITY, L.L.C., Marco Gamboa and Mira Bahia Corpus Christi, LP |
| 2:2024cv00057 |
| March 1, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| David S Morales |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Marco Gamboa, Mira Bahia Corpus Christi, LP, Proportional Prosperity, L.L.C., filed. (Galo, Michael) |
|
|
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Marco Gamboa, Mira Bahia Corpus Christi, LP, Proportional Prosperity, L.L.C., filed. Motion Docket Date 4/17/2024. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Galo, Michael) |
| Filing 6 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to All Defendants, filed.(Alexander, William) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Daniel Cavazos, filed.(Alexander, William) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(JorgeRosales, 2) |
|
|
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to All Defendants, filed.(Alexander, William) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-31275548) filed by Daniel Cavazos. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Alexander, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.