Olivarez v. Rivera et al
| Pedro Santos Olivarez, Jr |
| Sheriff Oscar Rivera, Judge Watley, District Attorney, Callie Adkins, Heather B. Marks and Douglas Defratus |
| 2:2025cv00167 |
| June 25, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| David S Morales |
| Mitchel Neurock |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 Compliance by Pedro Santos Olivarez, Jr, filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope) (lmp2) |
| Filing 16 FINAL JUDGMENT. Case terminated on 11/7/25 (Signed by Judge David S Morales) Parties notified. (aar2) |
Filing 15
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: construing Plaintiff's claim as a request for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. 2241; dismissing without prejudice Plaintiff's claim pursuant to the Younger abstention doctrine; vacating Judge Neurock's order for collection of initial partial filing fee; granting #2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; adopting #8 Memorandum and Recommendations, declining to impose a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). (Signed by Judge David S Morales) Parties notified. (lmp2)
|
| Filing 14 Compliance by Pedro Santos Olivarez, Jr, filed. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (lmp2) |
| Filing 13 Testimony as to Why Civil Liberties are Being Violated by Pedro Santos Olivarez, Jr, filed. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (lmp2) |
| Filing 12 Certified Mail Receipt Returned, executed on 7/24/2025 re: 9 Document(s) Sent - receipt attached, access restricted to court users for privacy reasons -, filed. (bnc2) |
| Filing 11 Compliance by Pedro Santos Olivarez, Jr, filed. (Attachments: #1 San Patricio County Jail Inmate Request Form, #2 Resident Account Summary, #3 Envelope) (bnc2) |
| Filing 10 CONSENT to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge by Pedro Santos Olivarez, Jr, filed. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (bnc2) |
| Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re #1 ComplainT. Objections to M&R due by 8/4/2025. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Mitchel Neurock) Parties notified. (lmp2) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge by Pedro Santos Olivarez, Jr, filed. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (lmp2) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/8/2025: #2 Duplicate Consent received 7/7/25 by mail, #3 Envelope) (gg2). |
Filing 6
ORDER for Initial Partial Filing Fee as to Pedro Santos Olivarez Jr.; granting #2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Signed by Magistrate Judge Mitchel Neurock) Parties notified. (ss2)
|
| Filing 5 CLERKS NOTICE of Exclusion, filed. (mam2) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (mam2) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Pedro Santos Olivarez, Jr, filed. (mam2) |
| Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma PauperisMotions referred to Mitchel Neurock. by Pedro Santos Olivarez, Jr, filed. Motion Docket Date 7/16/2025. (mam2) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 405) filed by Pedro Santos Olivarez, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint Pages 1,3,5, #2 Envelope) (mam2) |
| Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Mitchel Neurock randomly selected to receive referrals. This case will be automatically referred to the randomly selected magistrate judge under the governing Special Order or divisional procedures. (mam2) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.