Gomez v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Steven Joseph Gomez
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration
Interested Party: Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Case Number: 2:2025cv00169
Filed: June 27, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Julie K Hampton
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 15, 2025 Filing 18 RESPONSE to #13 Appellant's Brief , filed by Commissioner Social Security Administration. (Johnson, Victoria)
December 5, 2025 Filing 17 NOTICE of attorney substitution by Commissioner Social Security Administration. Attorney Victoria V. Johnson added. Attorney Natalie Bramlett Olszewski terminated, filed. (Johnson, Victoria)
November 18, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER granting #15 Motion for Extension of Time Defendant shall file a Response to Plaintiffs Brief in Support of Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment by 12/24/2025.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie K Hampton) Parties notified. (jrm2)
November 18, 2025 Filing 15 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time To File Defendant's Brief by Commissioner Social Security Administration, filed. Motion Docket Date 12/9/2025. (Montemayor, Ruben)
November 18, 2025 Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Ruben Montemayor on behalf of Commissioner Social Security Administration, filed. (Montemayor, Ruben)
October 24, 2025 Filing 13 Appellant's BRIEF by Steven Joseph Gomez, filed. (Bam, Maren)
September 23, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order. Brief due by 10/24/2025. Response Brief due by 11/24/2025. Reply Brief due by 12/8/2025. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie K Hampton) Parties notified. (var2)
September 22, 2025 Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to file Plaintiff Opening Brief by Steven Joseph Gomez, filed. Motion Docket Date 10/14/2025. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Bam, Maren)
August 25, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER & BRIEFING SCHEDULE (Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie K Hampton) Parties notified. (lb2)
August 25, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Steven Joseph Gomez and ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Julie K Hampton. Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos no longer assigned to the case. (Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified. (ss2)
August 25, 2025 Filing 8 ADMINISTRATIVE TRANSCRIPT/RECORD from Social Security Administration by Commissioner Social Security Administration, filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit p. 801 to p. 1645) (Olszewski, Natalie)
August 25, 2025 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Natalie Olszewski on behalf of Commissioner Social Security Administration, filed. (Olszewski, Natalie)
July 31, 2025 Filing 6 CONSENT to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge by Steven Joseph Gomez, filed. (Bam, Maren)
June 30, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Maren Miller Bam to Appear Pro Hac Vice Note: Instructions to request Texas Southern CM/ECF registration through PACER are found #here.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie K Hampton) Parties notified. (ma2)
June 30, 2025 Filing 4 CLERKS NOTICE of Exclusion, filed. (var2)
June 30, 2025 Filing 3 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent / Declination to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge in a Social Security case. Parties notified, filed. (var2)
June 27, 2025 Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Julie K. Hampton randomly selected to receive referrals. This case will be automatically referred to the randomly selected magistrate judge under the governing Special Order or divisional procedures. (var2)
June 27, 2025 Filing 2 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Maren Miller Bam (Fee Paid: $100, receipt number ATXSDC-33673777) by Steven Joseph Gomez, filed. Motion Docket Date 7/18/2025. (Bam, Maren)
June 27, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner Social Security Administration (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-33673775) (Commissioner of SSA and U.S. Attorney served by NEF at the designated email addresses.) filed by Steven Joseph Gomez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bam, Maren)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gomez v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steven Joseph Gomez
Represented By: Maren Ann-Miller Bam
Represented By: Maren Ann-Miller Bam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration
Represented By: Victoria Vina Johnson
Represented By: Ruben Montemayor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?