Connelly v. Parole Board et al
| Ryant Connelly |
| Parole Board, Parole District Office and Parole Officer Lasso |
| 2:2026cv00201 |
| July 8, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Mitchel Neurock |
| Nelva Gonzales Ramos |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CLERKS NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING. Parties notified. Notice of Compliance due by 8/7/2026, filed. (lmp2) |
| Filing 4 CLERKS NOTICE of Exclusion, filed. (lmp2) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening, with Notice Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. Party notified, filed. (lmp2) |
| Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Ryant Connelly, filed. Motions referred to Mitchel Neurock. Motion Docket Date 7/29/2026. (lmp2) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 405) filed by Ryant Connelly. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope) (lmp2) |
| Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Mitchel Neurock randomly selected to receive referrals. This case will be automatically referred to the randomly selected magistrate judge under the governing Special Order or divisional procedures. (lmp2) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
