Rivera v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Amanda G. Rivera |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel |
| 2:2026cv00203 |
| July 9, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Jason B Libby |
| Nelva Gonzales Ramos |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CLERKS NOTICE of Exclusion, filed. (ss2) |
| Filing 2 Clerk's Notice of Redaction Responsibilities and Privacy Protection. Parties notified, filed. (SDTX_CMECF_AutoDocket, ) |
| Filing 3 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent / Declination to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge in a Social Security case. Parties notified, filed. (ss2) |
| Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby randomly selected to receive referrals. This case will be automatically referred to the randomly selected magistrate judge under the governing Special Order or divisional procedures. (ss2) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-36301543) (Commissioner of SSA and U.S. Attorney served by NEF at the designated email addresses.) filed by Amanda G. Rivera. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Metsker, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
