United States Of v. Davenport, et al
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Gordon E Davenport
Case Number: 3:2003cv00923
Filed: October 27, 2003
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Galveston Office
County: Galveston
Presiding Judge: John R Froeschner
Nature of Suit: Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant)
Cause of Action: 88 U.S.C. ยง 8888
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 16, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 208 OPINION AND ORDER denying 206 Motion for Summary Judgment ; granting 198 Motion for Judgment.(Signed by Magistrate Judge John R Froeschner) Parties notified.(sanderson, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States Of v. Davenport, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Michelle C Johns
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gordon E Davenport
Represented By: Gordon E Davenport, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?