GSL Investments Inc v. Greif Inc, et al
Plaintiff: GSL Investments Inc
Defendant: Greif Inc, Greif Bros. Corporation and Curtis Bowman
Case Number: 3:2004cv00350
Filed: June 1, 2004
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Samuel B Kent
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 22, 2012 Archive Data: FRC Shipment id: 1011, Accession number: 021-08-0132, Location number: M4708114, Box number: 36, Type of documents sent to FRC: c, Date documents shipped to FRC: 08/01/2008, Disposal authority: IIA7b, Disposal date: 04/01/2033, Restriction code: N, Notes: Closed Civil Cases. Notes 2: 3:03cv869 thru 3:04cv408, filed. (dkellyadi, )
September 28, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER granting 10 Motion to Remand .( Signed by Judge Samuel B Kent ) Parties notified.(cmcbroom, )
August 17, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 19 DOCKET CONTROL ORDER setting Agreed mediator due 10/1/04 Plaintiff's expert witness list submitted by 4/15/05 Deft expert witness list submitted by 5/27/05 ; Discovery cutoff 7/22/05 ; Pretrial order to be submitted on or before 7/29/05 ; Pretrial Conference on 10:00 8/5/05 before Magistrate Judge John R. Froeschner , entered. Parties notified. ( Signed by Magistrate Judge John R. Froeschner ) Jury Trial set for 8/8/05 before Judge Samuel B. Kent. (mbergara)
August 4, 2004 Filing 18 Scheduling conference held before Judge Samuel B. Kent Ct Reporter: J. Byers ETT: 4 days Appearances:As noted on the record. Jury trial set for 8/8/05; order to follow. (mbergara)
August 4, 2004 Deadline updated; set jury trial for 8:30 8/8/05 ETT: 4 days before Judge Samuel B. Kent (mbergara)
August 2, 2004 Filing 17 SUR-REPLY to reply brief in support of [4-1] motion to dismiss by GSL Investments Inc , filed. (mbergara)
July 26, 2004 Filing 16 REPLY by GSL Investments Inc to response to [10-1] motion for remand , filed (gclark)
July 23, 2004 Filing 15 REPLY BRIEF by Greif Inc, Curtis Bowman in support of [4-1] motion to dismiss , filed. (gclark)
July 23, 2004 Filing 14 NOTICE of Joint Conference Report by GSL Investments Inc, Greif Inc, Curtis Bowman , filed (gclark)
July 23, 2004 received proposed docket control order (orig fwd to crd) (gclark)
July 8, 2004 Filing 13 RESPONSE by Greif Inc to [10-1] motion for remand , filed. (mbergara)
June 28, 2004 Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Greif Inc , filed. (mgore)
June 25, 2004 Filing 11 RESPONSE by GSL Investments Inc to [4-1] motion to dismiss, [4-2] motion for more definite statement , filed. (mbergara)
June 22, 2004 Filing 10 MOTION for remand by GSL Investments Inc, Motion Docket Date 7/12/04 [10-1] motion , filed. (mbergara)
June 16, 2004 Filing 9 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Greif Inc , filed. (mbergara)
June 14, 2004 Filing 8 ORIGINAL DECLARATION of Tammy Svjagintsev of Greif Inc, Curtis Bowman Re: [4-1] motion to dismiss , filed (mbergara)
June 14, 2004 Filing 7 ORIGINAL ANSWER to Complaint by Greif Inc , filed. (mbergara)
June 14, 2004 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Curtis Bowman , filed. (mbergara)
June 10, 2004 Filing 5 SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION In Support of [1-1] notice of removal by Greif Inc, Curtis Bowman , filed. (mbergara)
June 4, 2004 Filing 4 MOTION to dismiss , or for more definite statement by Greif Inc, Curtis Bowman, Motion Docket Date 6/24/04 [4-1] motion, 6/24/04 [4-2] motion , filed. (mbergara)
June 1, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER re:computer codes printed on proposed orders , entered; Parties notified. ( signed by Judge Samuel B. Kent ) (mbergara)
June 1, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER set scheduling conference for 1:00 8/4/04 before Judge Samuel B. Kent , entered; Parties notified. (mbergara)
June 1, 2004 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Greif Inc, Curtis Bowman filed FILING FEE $ 150 RECEIPT # 317885 (mbergara)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GSL Investments Inc v. Greif Inc, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Greif Inc
Represented By: Charles Thomas Kruse
Represented By: Matthew William Caligur
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Greif Bros. Corporation
Represented By: Charles Thomas Kruse
Represented By: Matthew William Caligur
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Curtis Bowman
Represented By: Rebecca A McGuire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: GSL Investments Inc
Represented By: Andrew Sher
Represented By: Kenneth Robert Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?