Peterek v. Fidelity National Property and Casualty Company, a corporation
| Ben Peterek |
| Fidelity National Property and Casualty Company, a corporation |
| 3:2010mc07026 |
| April 27, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Galveston Office |
| John R Froeschner |
| Other |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2013. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Dft and against Pltf. It is, therefore, ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Plaintiff, Ben Peterek, RECOVER NOTHING, that his action is DISMISSED on the merits, with prejudice, and that each Party bear their own costs.. Case terminated on 9/10/13(Signed by Magistrate Judge John R Froeschner) Parties notified.(sanderson, 3)
|
|
Filing 19
OPINION AND ORDER granting #12 Motion for Summary Judgment and that the #2 Amended Complaint of Plaintiff, Ben Peterek, is DISMISSED.(Signed by Magistrate Judge John R Froeschner) Parties notified.(sanderson, 3)
|
| Filing 18 REPLY in Support of #12 MOTION for Summary Judgment, filed by Fidelity National Property and Casualty Company, a corporation. (Attachments: #1 Ex. 1, #2 Ex. 2, #3 Ex. 3, #4 Ex. 4, #5 Ex. 5, #6 Ex. 6, #7 Ex. 7, #8 Ex. 8)(Jones, Bradley) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER that Dft's reply, if any, to Pltf's response is EXTENDED re: #12 MOTION for Summary Judgment ; Dft's Reply, if any, due by 6/28/2013(Signed by Magistrate Judge John R Froeschner) Parties notified.(sanderson, )
|
| Filing 16 EXHIBITS by Ben Peterek, filed. (Attachments: #1 exhibit 5-8)(Mayo, Martin) |
| Filing 15 RESPONSE to #12 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Ben Peterek. (Attachments: #1 memorandum, #2 undisputed facts)(Mayo, Martin) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER that Pltf's response and Dft's reply are EXTENDED re: #12 MOTION for Summary Judgment ; Pltf's Responses due by 6/7/2013. Dft's Reply, if any, due by 6/21/2013(Signed by Magistrate Judge John R Froeschner) Parties notified.(sanderson, )
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER with the agreement of the Parties the response and reply deadline are extended re: #12 MOTION for Summary Judgment : Pltf's Response due by 5/31/2013. Dft's Reply, if any, due by 6/14/2013(Signed by Magistrate Judge John R Froeschner) Parties notified.(sanderson, )
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Fidelity National Property and Casualty Company, a corporation, filed. Motion Docket Date 5/10/2013. (Attachments: #1 Ex. 1, #2 Ex. 2, #3 Ex. 3, #4 Ex. 4, #5 Ex. 5, #6 Ex. 6, #7 Ex. 7, #8 Ex. 8, #9 Ex. 9, #10 Ex. 10, #11 Ex. 11, #12 Ex. 12, #13 Ex. 13, #14 Ex. 14, #15 Ex. 15, #16 Ex. 16, #17 Ex. 17, #18 Ex. 18, #19 Ex. 19, #20 Ex. 20, #21 Ex. 21, #22 Ex. 22, #23 Ex. 23, #24 Ex. 24, #25 Ex. 25, #26 Ex. 26, #27 Proposed Order)(Jones, Bradley) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER that, in light of the #10 Briefing Schedule previously issued by this Court, the Non-Jury Trial current set on May 15, 2013, is CANCELLED....**** Deadlines terminated: *** Bench Trial set for 5/15/2013 at 09:30 AM is CANCELLED (Signed by Magistrate Judge John R Froeschner) Parties notified.(sanderson, )
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER that Dft's Motion for Summary Judgment due by 4/19/2013. Responses due by 5/17/2013. Replies due by 5/24/2013(Signed by Magistrate Judge John R Froeschner) Parties notified.(sanderson, )
|
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge John R Froeschner. TELEPHONE STATUS CONFERENCE held on 4/9/2013. Appearances: Kim Tran Britt, William T Treas, Martin L Mayo., filed.(sanderson, )*** Status of case discussed with Court. MSJ, response & reply deadlines set. Order to follow. |
|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER. ETT: 2 Days. Bench Trial - Pltf Expert Witness List due by 1/18/2013. Deft Expert Witness List due by 2/15/2013. Discovery due by 3/29/2013. Witness & Exhibits Lists due 5/8/13.... *** Bench Trial set for 5/15/2013 at 09:30 AM in 7th Floor Courtroom before Magistrate Judge John R Froeschner (Signed by Magistrate Judge John R Froeschner) Parties notified.(sanderson, )
|
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge John R Froeschner. TELEPHONE STATUS CONFERENCE held on 12/5/2012. Appearances: Kim Tran Britt, Martin L Mayo., filed.(sanderson, )**** Deadlines in case discussed with Court. Order to follow. |
| Filing 8 JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by Fidelity National Property and Casualty Company, a corporation, Ben Peterek, filed.(sanderson, ) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Samuel Bearman on behalf of Ben Peterek, filed. (Mayo, Martin) |
| Filing 6 STATUS REPORT by Fidelity National Property and Casualty Company, a corporation, Ben Peterek, filed.(Britt, Kim) |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Fidelity National Property and Casualty Company, a corporation identifying Fidelity National Insurance Company, National Alliance Marketing Group, Inc., and Fidelity National Financial as Corporate Parent, filed.(Britt, Kim) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #2 Amended Complaint/Counterclaim/Crossclaim etc. by Fidelity National Property and Casualty Company, a corporation, filed.(Britt, Kim) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Kim Tran Britt on behalf of Fidelity National Property and Casualty Company, a corporation, filed. (Britt, Kim) |
| Filing 2 AMENDED Complaint against Fidelity National Property and Casualty Company, a corporation filed by Ben Peterek.(Mayo, Martin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Fidelity National Property and Casualty Company, a corporation filed by Ben Peterek.(ccarnewadi, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
