Williams v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice Correctional Institutions Division
| Jerold Williams |
| Texas Department Of Criminal Justice Correctional Institutions Division and Angel Davila |
| 3:2011cv00313 |
| July 8, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Galveston Office |
| Brazoria |
| Kenneth M. Hoyt |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
205
ORDER DISMISSING THE REMAINING PLAINTIFFS' FEDERAL CLAIMS AND REMANDING THE REMAINING PLAINTIFFS' STATE-LAW CLAIMS(Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified. (dperez, 3).
|
|
Filing
175
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 167 Plaintiffs' MOTION for Summary Judgment and Brief in Support and granting in part and denying in part 169 Defendants' MOTION for Summary Judgment with Brief in Support. Plaintiffs Jerold Williams (No. 3:11-cv-00313), Alejandro Avila (No. 3:11-cv-00316), Joshua Mazique Burton (No. 3:11-cv-00317), Xavier Cooper (No. 3:11-cv-00318), Benjamin Martin (No. 3:11-cv-00320), Benjamin Vallie, Jr. (No. 3:11-cv-00322), Billy Wayne Morgan (No. 3:11-cv-00327), Jerome Degree (No. 3:11-cv-00342), Leon Harper (No. 3:11-cv-00346), and Eliazar M. Rincon (No. 3:11-cv-00348), and defendant Santos Montez, are hereby dismissed from this action. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Hoyt) Parties notified.(chorace)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
