Gordon v. University Of Texas Medical Branch
Plaintiff: Brian Gordon
Defendant: University Of Texas Medical Branch
Case Number: 3:2016cv00042
Filed: February 11, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Galveston Office
County: Galveston
Presiding Judge: George C. Hanks
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 2, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER granting 37 MOTION to Dismiss 34 Amended Complaint/Counterclaim/Crossclaim etc. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(dperez, 3)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gordon v. University Of Texas Medical Branch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brian Gordon
Represented By: Daphne L Pattison
Represented By: Jennifer Denise Ward
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: University Of Texas Medical Branch
Represented By: Shana Johnson Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?