Lopez v. Jones et al
| Arthur Lopez, III |
| Erin Jones, Erin Freman, Rebecca Noland, Larry L Garza, UTMB-CMHC, Gianmsrco Vizzeri & Associates Ophthalmology O.D., Larry Leininger and C Frayer-Herzog |
| 3:2016cv00311 |
| November 7, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Galveston Office |
| Brazoria |
| George C Hanks |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER 20 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel is Denied, 34 MOTION to Compel Reply to Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is Denied, 22 MOTION for Appointment of of Expert Witnes s is Denied, 27 MOTION In Limine is Denied, 28 MOTION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad testificandum is Denied, 11 MOTION for Leave to File an Amended Complaintis Granted, 29 MOTION In Limine is Denied. Email sent to Manager of Three St rikes List. The Martinez report, which has been construed as a motion for summary judgment on behalf of the defendants (Dkt. 18), is GRANTED. The complaint filed by Plaintiff Arthur Lopez is DISMISSED with prejudice.(Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(agould, 3)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER granting 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified. Copy to TDCJ Office of General Counsel and to Inmate Trust Fund.(dperez, 3)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
