Booth v. Galveston County et al
| Aaron Booth and Cody Tucker |
| Galveston County, Kerry Neves, Lonnie Cox, John Ellisor, Patricia Grady, Anne B Darring, Michelle Slaughter, John Grady, Barbara Roberts, Jack Ewing, Mark Baker, Kerri Foley, James Woltz, Jack Roady and Stephen W Baker |
| The Office of the Attorney General - Amicus Curiae |
| 3:2018cv00104 |
| April 8, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Galveston Office |
| Galveston |
| George C Hanks |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
367
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 360 Memorandum and Recommendations (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(KimberlyPicota, 4)
|
|
Filing
360
MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re Defendants' motions to dismiss (Dkts. 331 , 333 , 336 , 337 ). Objections to M&R due by 7/19/2023. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison) Parties notified. (RubenCastro, 3)
|
|
Filing
279
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS & PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 267 is APPROVED AND ADOPTED, as modified in its entirety as the holding of the Court. The parties Objections to Magistrate Judges Report and Recommendation.(Dkts.) 272275 are OVERRULED; The Motion for Preliminary Injunction [Dkt. 3-1] is DENIED; The 205 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction is GRANTED.(Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(ltrevino, 3)
|
|
Filing
267
MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION entered. The Court RECOMMENDS that the Motion for Preliminary Injunction [Dkt. 3-1] be DENIED and the Motion for Preliminary Injunction Requiring Counsel at Initial Bail Hearings [Dkt. 205] be GRANTED to the extent described in this Memorandum and Recommendation. Objections to M&R due by 8/21/2019. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison) Parties notified. (wbostic, 4)
|
|
Filing
227
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 213 Memorandum and Recommendations; GRANTING 32 Amended MOTION to Certify Class. CLASS CERTIFIED.(Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(dwilkerson, 3)
|
|
Filing
213
MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION entered. The Court RECOMMENDS that the Amended Motion for Class Certification [Dkt. 32] be GRANTED and the following class be certified under Rule 23(b)(2): all people who are or will be detained in Galveston County Jail on felony and state-jail felony charges because they are unable to pay secured bail set at magistration. Objections to M&R due by 3/26/2019. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison) Parties notified. (wbostic, 4)
|
|
Filing
165
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Dkt 151 Memorandum and Recommendations is APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Dkt 45 Amended MOTION to Dismiss All Claims Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6)is DENIED; Dkt 46 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) and Brief in Support is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, claims against the Magistrates in their official capacities are DISMISSED. Dkt 47 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and for Failure to St ate a Claim is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Specifically, the claims asserted against the District Court Judges in their individual capacities are DISMISSED. Dkt 48 MOTION to Dismiss is DENIED; Dkt 94 Second MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction is DENIED; Dkt 127 First MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1)is DENIED. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(ltrevino, 3)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
