Paddio v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. et al
| Deveron Paddio, Sr |
| Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and Walmart, Inc. |
| 3:2018cv00213 |
| July 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Galveston Office |
| Harris |
| George C Hanks |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Summons Issued as to Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Walmart, Inc.. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by First-class mail, filed.(agould, 3) |
| Filing 4 Request for Issuance of Summons as to All Defendants, filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit summons as to Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, #2 Exhibit summons as to Wal-Mart, Inc.)(Coane, Bruce) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Deveron Paddio, Sr, filed.(Swiger, Matthew) |
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 10/23/2018 at 09:30 AM in 7th Floor Courtroom before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison(Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(dwilkerson, 3)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-20551659) filed by Deveron Paddio, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Coane, Bruce) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
