Dunham v. Ward et al
Thomas Eugene Dunham |
Michael B Crow, Aaron J Tomkins, R. Pool, Rockella L Neal, Calvin E. Tucker, Kim Ward and Shalonda J Lee |
3:2018cv00244 |
August 29, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
George C Hanks |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER OF DISMISSAL #2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Case terminated on 10/23/2018 (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(agould, 3) |
Filing 5 CLERKS NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING as to Thomas Eugene Dunham. Parties notified Notice of Compliance due by 10/9/2018, filed. (Attachments: #1 Appendix) (bgoolsby, 4) |
Filing 4 CLERKS NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING as to Thomas Eugene Dunham. Parties notified Notice of Compliance due by 10/5/2018, filed. (Attachments: #1 Appendix) (bgoolsby, 4) |
Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (ltrevino, 3) |
Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Thomas Eugene Dunham, filed. Motion Docket Date 9/19/2018. (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(ltrevino, 3) |
Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400) filed by Thomas Eugene Dunham.(ltrevino, 3) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/30/2018: #1 Envelope Letter) (ltrevino, 3). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.