Handy v. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries America, Inc.
| Donald Handy |
| Mitsubishi Heavy Industries America, Inc. |
| 3:2018cv00419 |
| December 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| George C Hanks |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Resetting as to #13 REQUEST for pre-motion conference, #14 Notice of Setting. Parties notified. Pre-Motion Conference RESET for 3/1/2019 at 09:00 AM by telephone before Judge George C Hanks Jr, filed. (jegonzalez, 3) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Setting as to #13 REQUEST for pre-motion conference. Parties notified. Pre-Motion Conference set for 2/1/2019 at 09:00 AM by telephone before Judge George C Hanks Jr, filed. (jegonzalez, 3) |
| Filing 13 REQUEST for pre-motion conference, filed.(Marrs, Scott) |
Filing 12
ORDER Striking Document re: #11 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Original Complaint Under Rule 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) and Alternatively, Motion to Compel Arbitration. Motion does not comply with Court's procedures.(Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(lusmith, 3)
|
| Filing 11 (MOTION STRICKEN. SEE #12 ORDER STRIKING DOCUMENT). MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Original Complaint Under Rule 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) and Alternatively, Motion to Compel Arbitration by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries America, Inc., filed. Motion Docket Date 2/12/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Employment Agreement, #2 Exhibit B - Election to Arbitrate, #3 Proposed Order)(Escobar, Benjamin) Modified on 1/28/2019 (lusmith, 3). |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time; Answer due for Mitsubishi Heavy Industries America, Inc. 1/23/2019.(Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(ltrevino, 3)
|
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Original Complaint by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries America, Inc., filed. Motion Docket Date 1/30/2019. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Escobar, Benjamin) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Donald Handy, filed.(Schreiber, Richard) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard J. (Rex) Burch on behalf of Donald Handy, filed. (Burch, Richard) |
| Filing 6 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Mitsubishi Heavy Industries America, Inc. served on 12/19/2018, answer due 1/9/2019, filed.(Schreiber, Richard) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 3/27/2019 at 09:30 AM in 7th Floor Courtroom before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison(Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(dwilkerson, 3)
|
| Summons Issued as to Mitsubishi Heavy Industries America, Inc.. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by First-class mail, filed.(agould, 3) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew W. Dunlap on behalf of Donald Handy, filed. (Dunlap, Andrew) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard M. Schreiber on behalf of Donald Handy, filed. (Schreiber, Richard) |
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Mitsubishi Heavy Industries America, Inc., filed.(Josephson, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mitsubishi Heavy Industries America, Inc. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-21434690) filed by Donald Handy. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Consent, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Josephson, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
