Matthews et al v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner: Ryan Antonio Matthews and Bryan William Garris
Respondent: Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Case Number: 3:2019cv00192
Filed: June 13, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: George C Hanks
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER. It is ORDERED that Respondent's answer or dispositive motion due on 10/11/2019 must include a response to the allegations, legal arguments and claims rasied in #7 Petitioner's pretrial memorandum.(Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(dwilkerson, 3)
July 25, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah Harp on behalf of Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID, filed. (Harp, Sarah)
July 22, 2019 Filing 7 PRETRIAL MEMORANDUM by Ryan Antonio Matthews(Garris, Bryan)
July 22, 2019 Filing 6 SEALED EXHIBITS by Ryan Antonio Matthews, filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 20, #21 Exhibit 21, #22 Exhibit 22, #23 Exhibit 23, #24 Exhibit 24, #25 Exhibit 25) (Garris, Bryan)
July 15, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Intent to File Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Memorandum with Exhibits (Amended) by Ryan Antonio Matthews, filed. (Garris, Bryan)
July 3, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance as Attorney of Record and Notice of Intent to File Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Memorandum with Exhibits by Ryan Antonio Matthews, filed. (Garris, Bryan)
July 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER TO ANSWER/SERVICE ON TX ATTORNEY GENERAL. Answer due for Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID 10/11/2019.(Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(dwilkerson, 3) .
June 14, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (agould, 3)
June 13, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 0541-22607984) filed by Ryan Antonio Matthews.(Garris, Bryan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Matthews et al v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ryan Antonio Matthews
Represented By: Bryan William Lee Garris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Bryan William Garris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Represented By: Sarah Miranda Harp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?