Hartwell v. Davis
Ross Hartwell |
Lori Davis and Lorie Davis |
3:2019cv00210 |
June 24, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
George C Hanks |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ***Docketed In Error***CONSENT to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge by Ross Hartwell, filed. (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Envelope)(JessicaVillarreal, 3) (Mailed documents to Clerk of Western District of Texas-Austin Divison, for filing on 7/16/2019) |
Filing 6 ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE to Western District of Texas Austin Division (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(ltrevino, 3) |
Interdistrict transfer to Western District of Texas Austin Division. Case transferred electronically. Case terminated on 6/27/19, filed. (ltrevino, 3) |
Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (JessicaVillarreal, 3) |
Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Ross Hartwell, filed. (JessicaVillarreal, 3) |
Filing 3 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Ross Hartwell, filed. (JessicaVillarreal, 3) |
Filing 2 MEMORANDUM in Support re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Ross Hartwell, filed.(JessicaVillarreal, 3) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5) filed by Ross Hartwell. (Attachments: #1 Attachment A, #2 Attachment B, #3 Letter, #4 Envelope)(JessicaVillarreal, 3) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.