Sweetin et al v. Texas City et al
| Michael Stefek and Zane Sweetin |
| Wendell Wylie, City of Texas City and City of Texas City, Texas |
| 3:2019cv00233 |
| July 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Jeffrey V Brown |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Reassignment to Judge Jeffrey V Brown, pursuant to General Order No. 2019-8. Deadlines in scheduling orders remain in effect Judge George C Hanks, Jr no longer assigned to the case. Parties notified, filed. (ndiaz, 4) |
| Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by First-class mail, filed.(dwilkerson, 3) |
| Filing 3 Request for Issuance of Summons as to All Defendants, filed. (Attachments: #1 Additional Summons)(Kallinen, Randall) |
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 10/16/2019 at 09:30 AM in 7th Floor Courtroom before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison(Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(agould, 3)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-22789397) filed by Zane Sweetin, Michael Stefek. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kallinen, Randall) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
