Been v. Davis
Johnathan Pierce Been |
Edward Marshall and Lorie Davis |
3:2019cv00314 |
September 16, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Jeffrey V Brown |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
RECEIPT of Transfer received via email notification re: transfer of case to Western District of Texas. New Case # assigned: 5:19-cv-01176 and received on 09/30/2019., filed. (BrendaLacy, 4) |
Filing 6 Interdistrict transfer to USDC Western District, San Antonio Division. Case transferred electronically. Case terminated on 9/30/19, filed. (ltrevino, 3) |
Filing 5 ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE to United States District for the Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division (Signed by Judge Jeffrey V Brown) Parties notified.(ltrevino, 3) |
Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Johnathan Pierce Been, filed. (Attachment(s): #1 Authorization) (JessicaVillarreal, 3). |
Filing 3 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Johnathan Pierce Been, filed. Motion Docket Date 10/7/2019. (JessicaVillarreal, 3) |
Filing 2 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (JessicaVillarreal, 3) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5) filed by Johnathan Pierce Been. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JessicaVillarreal, 3) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.