COKE v. United States of America, on behalf of Coastal Health and Wellness, a Federally Supported Health Center
LAJUNE COKE |
United States of America, on behalf of Coastal Health and Wellness, a Federally Supported Health Center |
3:2020cv00302 |
September 25, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Jeffrey V Brown |
Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER (Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison) Parties notified.(agould, 3) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by United States of America, on behalf of Coastal Health and Wellness, a Federally Supported Health Center, filed.(Hinrichs, Fred) |
Filing 7 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to United States of America, on behalf of Coastal Health and Wellness, a Federally Supported Health Center served on 10/6/2020, answer due 12/7/2020, filed.(Greenlee, Scott) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by LaJune Coke, filed.(Greenlee, Scott) |
Filing 5 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to United States of America, on behalf of Coastal Health and Wellness, a Federally Supported Health Center served on 9/30/2020, answer due 11/30/2020, filed.(Greenlee, Scott) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to United States of America, on behalf of Coastal Health and Wellness, a Federally Supported Health Center, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Issued summons returned to plaintiff by NEF, filed. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(JessicaVillarreal, 3) |
Filing 3 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 12/16/2020 at 09:30 AM in 7th Floor Courtroom before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison(Signed by Judge Jeffrey V Brown) Parties notified.(agould, 3) |
Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to All Defendants, filed. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Greenlee, Scott) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States of America, on behalf of Coastal Health and Wellness, a Federally Supported Health Center (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-25264154) filed by LAJUNE COKE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Greenlee, Scott) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: COKE v. United States of America, on behalf of Coastal Health and Wellness, a Federally Supported Health Center | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: LAJUNE COKE | |
Represented By: | Scott C Greenlee |
Represented By: | Shawn Paul Fox |
Represented By: | Sean Patrick Tracey |
Represented By: | Lance Nolan Walters |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: United States of America, on behalf of Coastal Health and Wellness, a Federally Supported Health Center | |
Represented By: | Fred Turner Hinrichs |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.