McCall-SB, Inc. v. CitiBank N A
| McCall-SB, Inc. |
| CitiBank N A |
| 3:2020cv00328 |
| October 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Jeffrey V Brown |
| Condemnation |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by McCall-SB, Inc.. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by McCall-SB, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Ganucheau, Thomas) |
Filing 12
ORDER regarding appearance by Zoom videoconference.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison) Parties notified.(JessicaVillarreal, 3)
|
| ***Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings: Initial Conference set for 1/21/2021 at 09:30 AM in by video before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison (JessicaVillarreal, 3) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by CitiBank N A, filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Fibbe, George) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Kelly E. Hanen on behalf of CitiBank N A, filed. (Hanen, Kelly) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Aaron Streett on behalf of CitiBank N A, filed. (Streett, Aaron) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by CitiBank N A, filed.(Fibbe, George) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by George H. Fibbe on behalf of CitiBank N A, filed. (Fibbe, George) |
| Filing 6 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to CitiBank N A served on 11/6/2020, answer due 11/27/2020, filed.(Ganucheau, Thomas) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by McCall-SB, Inc., filed.(Ganucheau, Thomas) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 1/14/2021 at 09:30 AM in 7th Floor Courtroom before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison(Signed by Judge Jeffrey V Brown) Parties notified.(agould, 3)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to CitiBank N A. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(JessicaVillarreal, 3) |
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to CitiBank N A, filed.(Ganucheau, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CitiBank N A (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-25405744) filed by McCall-SB, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ganucheau, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: McCall-SB, Inc. v. CitiBank N A | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: McCall-SB, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Thomas Edward Ganucheau |
| Represented By: | James Kennedy Taylor |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CitiBank N A | |
| Represented By: | Kelly Elizabeth Hanen |
| Represented By: | George Harold Fibbe |
| Represented By: | Aaron Michael Streett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
