Polk v. Titlemax of Texas, Inc. et al
Stephen Polk |
Titlemax of Texas, Inc. and Asset Res Services, LLC |
3:2021cv00075 |
March 25, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Jeffrey V Brown |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER (Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison) Parties notified.(agould, 3) |
Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Titlemax of Texas, Inc. served on 4/5/2021, answer due 6/4/2021, filed.(Hubbard, John) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(JessicaVillarreal, 3) |
Filing 4 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Asset Res Services, LLC, filed.(Hubbard, John) |
Filing 3 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Titlemax of Texas, Inc., filed.(Hubbard, John) |
Filing 2 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 6/16/2021 at 09:30 AM in by video before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison(Signed by Judge Jeffrey V Brown) Parties notified.(agould, 3) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-26171719) filed by Stephen Polk. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet A)(Hubbard, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.