Antunez v. Eustis Testing Equipment LLC et al
Carrie Antunez |
Eustis Testing Equipment LLC, Eustis Engineering LLC and Murphy Romero |
3:2021cv00231 |
August 31, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Jeffrey V Brown |
Motor Vehicle |
23 U.S.C. ยง 134 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 INITIAL DISCLOSURES by Carrie Antunez, filed.(Schroeder, John) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Carrie Antunez, filed.(Schroeder, John) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by Eustis Engineering LLC, Eustis Testing Equipment LLC, Murphy Romero, filed.(Dizon, Jason) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Eustis Engineering LLC. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(MarySanchez, 3) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Eustis Testing Equipment LLC. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(MarySanchez, 3) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Murphy Romero. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(MarySanchez, 3) |
![]() |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-26973571) filed by Carrie Antunez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Summons for Def Murphy Romero, #2 Civil Summons for Eustis Testing Equipment, #3 Civil Summons for Eustis Engineering LLC)(Schroeder, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.