Alvarez v. Unknown Medical Provider et al
| Jose A. Alvarez, Jr |
| Unknown Medical Provider, Unknown Estelle Unit UTMB Provider, Jeremy Samuel Somerson, Jason Rainer Coffman and Chief Medical Officer |
| 3:2021cv00355 |
| December 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Jeffrey V Brown |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time by Jose A. Alvarez, Jr, filed. Motion Docket Date 3/4/2022. (dnoriega, 1) |
| Filing 5 Request for Entry of Default Judgment by Jose A. Alvarez, Jr, addressed to the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (5uscca 21-50208) re: 5:20cv769, in the Western District of Texas., filed.(jdav, 4) |
| Filing 4 CLERKS NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING as to Jose A. Alvarez, Jr. Parties notified Notice of Compliance due by 2/3/2022, filed. (Attachments: #1 Appendix) (bgoolsby, 4) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (CynthiaBenavides, 3) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Jose A. Alvarez, Jr, filed. Motion Docket Date 1/10/2022. (CynthiaBenavides, 3) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402) filed by Jose A. Alvarez, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Letter, #3 Envelope)(CynthiaBenavides, 3) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
