Goodnight et al v. Kinard et al
Gregory Garland Goodnight, Richard Blake Bradley and Joseph Dwain Gore |
District Clerk John Kinard, Sean King, Alyssa Sosa, Hon. Patricia Grady, Judge John Ellisor, Jack Roady and Sheriff Henry Trochesset |
3:2022cv00258 |
July 20, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Jeffrey V Brown |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Gregory Garland Goodnight re: #3 Notice to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening, filed. An updated address could not be found. (DMcKinnieRichardson, 4) |
Filing 4 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Gregory Garland Goodnight re: #3 Notice to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening, filed. Address updated and notice was re-noticed. (SierraThomasAnderson, 4) |
Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (agould, 3) |
Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Gregory Garland Goodnight, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/10/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(agould, 3) |
Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402) filed by Joseph Dwain Gore, Richard Blake Bradley, Gregory Garland Goodnight. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Letter, #3 Envelope)(agould, 3) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.