Jackson et al v. Clear Creek Independent School District
| Ms. Chanda Jackson, Ms. Tatiawana Jackson, Chanda Jackson, Tatiawana Jackson and Tatiawna Jordan |
| Clear Creek Independent School District |
| 3:2022cv00271 |
| July 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Jeffrey V Brown |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Intent to File Rule 12(b) Motion to Dismiss by Clear Creek Independent School District, filed. (Gilbert, Christopher) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher B. Gilbert on behalf of Clear Creek Independent School District, filed. (Gilbert, Christopher) |
| Filing 3 First AMENDED COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Clear Creek Independent School District, Tatiawna Jordan filed by Chanda Jackson.(Webb, Todd) |
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 11/9/2022 at 09:00 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison(Signed by Judge Jeffrey V Brown) Parties notified.(VanesaAranda, 3)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-28538448) filed by Chanda Jackson.(Webb, Todd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
