Rister v. Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc. et al
| MATT THOMAS RISTER |
| DOVENMUEHLE MORTGAGE, INC. and NEXBANK SSB |
| 3:2023cv00148 |
| May 16, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Jeffrey V Brown |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
PROTECTIVE ORDER (Signed by Judge Jeffrey V Brown) Parties notified.(GeorgeCardenas, 3)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER on Initial Discovery Protocols for Residential Mortgage Cases.(Signed by Judge Jeffrey V Brown) Parties notified.(GeorgeCardenas, 3)
|
| Filing 3 Certificate of Service by Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc., NexBank SSB, filed.(Abreo, Damian) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 8/23/2023 at 09:00 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison (Signed by Judge Jeffrey V Brown) Parties notified.(VanesaAranda, 3)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Galveston County District Court, case number 23-CV-0680 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-29925839) filed by NEXBANK SSB, DOVENMUEHLE MORTGAGE, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit)(Abreo, Damian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
