Bailey v. Baldridge et al
| Victor Eugene Bailey |
| Justin Baldridge, Thomas Brennan, Jose Cortez, Victor Martinez, Amanda Buchenek, Gregory Fredericks, Caitlyn O'Dell, Terence Brigham, Anthony Etim, Anthony Johnson and Joe Lopez |
| 3:2023cv00151 |
| May 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Jeffrey V Brown |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying #4 Motion to Appoint. (documents sent as per order) (Signed by Judge Jeffrey V Brown) Parties notified.(AndyGould, 3)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (VanesaAranda, 3) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Victor Eugene Bailey, filed. Motion Docket Date 6/6/2023. (VanesaAranda, 3) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Victor Eugene Bailey, filed. (VanesaAranda, 3) |
| Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Victor Eugene Bailey, filed. Motion Docket Date 6/6/2023. (VanesaAranda, 3) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402) filed by Victor Eugene Bailey. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Summons, #3 Envelope)(VanesaAranda, 3) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
