Tanner et al v. ASI Lloyds et al
| Jordan Tanner and Megan Tanner |
| ASI Lloyds and Mark Hendrix |
| 3:2023cv00320 |
| September 25, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Jeffrey V Brown |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by ASI Lloyds, filed.(Schexnyder, LaDonna) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Jordan Tanner, Megan Tanner, filed.(Fulton, Amanda) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 State Court Petition/Notice of Removal with Jury Demand by ASI Lloyds, filed.(Schexnyder, LaDonna) |
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 2/14/2024 at 09:00 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison (Signed by Judge Jeffrey V Brown) Parties notified. (VanesaAranda, 3)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 56th JDC of Galveston County, Texas, case number 23-CV-1428 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-30558485) filed by ASI Lloyds. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet with Attached List of Counsel, #2 Index of Matters Being Filed, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 List of All Counsel of Record, #7 Certificate of Interested Parties, #8 State Court Notice of Removal)(Schexnyder, LaDonna) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.