Spring Branch Wildlife Preserve et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
| Spring Branch Wildlife Preserve and Ted Dahl |
| United States Environmental Protection Agency |
| 3:2023cv00398 |
| December 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Jeffrey V Brown |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Spring Branch Wildlife Preserve, Ted Dahl filed by Spring Branch Wildlife Preserve, Ted Dahl.(Hootman, Timothy) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to United States Environmental Protection Agency. Issued summons returned to plaintiff by NEF, filed. (VanesaAranda, 3) |
| Filing 3 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Ted Dahl, Spring Branch Wildlife Preserve, filed.(Hootman, Timothy) |
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 3/13/2024 at 09:00 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison. (Signed by Judge Jeffrey V Brown) Parties notified.(VanesaAranda, 3)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States Environmental Protection Agency (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-30952631) filed by Spring Branch Wildlife Preserve, Ted Dahl.(Hootman, Timothy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
