Pomier v. BrandSafway, LLC et al
Thonolaus Darrell Pomier |
BrandSafway, LLC, The Dow Chemical Company, Dow Chemical Company, All American Screen, LLC, Marcelo Investments, Inc (Disa) and University MRO, LLC |
3:2024cv00010 |
January 5, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Jeffrey V Brown |
Labor: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 JOINDER in #21 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant BrandSafway LLC's Renewed Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) , filed by Dow Chemical Company. (Vasut, Cody) |
Filing 21 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant BrandSafway LLC's Renewed Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) by BrandSafway, LLC, filed. Motion Docket Date 3/19/2024. (Manning, Stephanie) |
Filing 20 ORDER granting #17 Motion for Extension of Time; Motion-related deadline set re: #17 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time Defendant's Second Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Answer due by 3/4/2024.(Signed by Judge Jeffrey V Brown) Parties notified.(GeorgeCardenas, 3) |
Filing 19 ORDER granting #18 Motion for Extension of Time; Motion-related deadline set re: #18 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time Defendant The Dow Chemical Company's Unopposed Second Motion to Extend Deadline to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Answer due by 3/4/2024.(Signed by Judge Jeffrey V Brown) Parties notified.(GeorgeCardenas, 3) |
Filing 18 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time Defendant The Dow Chemical Company's Unopposed Second Motion to Extend Deadline to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint by Dow Chemical Company, filed. Motion Docket Date 3/7/2024. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Vasut, Cody) |
Filing 17 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time Defendant's Second Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint by BrandSafway, LLC, filed. Motion Docket Date 3/6/2024. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Manning, Stephanie) |
Filing 16 ORDER granting #14 Motion for Extension of Time; Motion-related deadline set re: #14 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time Defendant The Dow Chemical Company's Motion to Extend Deadline to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Answer due by 2/20/2024.(Signed by Judge Jeffrey V Brown) Parties notified.(GeorgeCardenas, 3) |
Filing 15 ORDER granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time; Motion-related deadline set re: #13 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time Defendant BrandSafway, LLCs Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint. Answer due by 2/20/2024.(Signed by Judge Jeffrey V Brown) Parties notified.(GeorgeCardenas, 3) |
Filing 14 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time Defendant The Dow Chemical Company's Motion to Extend Deadline to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint by Dow Chemical Company, filed. Motion Docket Date 2/26/2024. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Vasut, Cody) |
Filing 13 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time Defendant BrandSafway, LLCs Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint by BrandSafway, LLC, filed. Motion Docket Date 2/22/2024. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Manning, Stephanie) |
Filing 12 MOTION for Default Judgment against All American Screen, LLC, Marcelo Investments, Inc (Disa), University MRO, LLC by Thonolaus Darrell Pomier, filed. Motion Docket Date 2/12/2024. (AndyGould, 3) |
Filing 11 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Thonolaus Darrell Pomier.(AndyGould, 3) |
Filing 10 Rule 6 Sua Sponte Leave to Amend. Amended Pleadings due by 2/12/2024.(Signed by Judge Jeffrey V Brown) Parties notified.(GeorgeCardenas, 3) |
Filing 9 JOINDER in #8 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant BrandSafway LLCs Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.12(b)(6) , filed by Dow Chemical Company. (Vasut, Cody) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant BrandSafway LLCs Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.12(b)(6) by BrandSafway, LLC, filed. Motion Docket Date 2/2/2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order)(Manning, Stephanie) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE IN A REMOVED ACTION by BrandSafway, LLC, filed.(Manning, Stephanie) |
Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Dow Chemical Company identifying Dow, Inc. as Corporate Parent, filed.(Vasut, Cody) |
Filing 5 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Notice of Removal, by BrandSafway, LLC, filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit E, #2 Exhibit F)(Manning, Stephanie) |
Filing 4 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 4/3/2024 at 09:00 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison. (Signed by Judge Jeffrey V Brown) Parties notified.(VanesaAranda, 3) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by BrandSafway, LLC, filed.(Manning, Stephanie) |
Filing 2 CONSENT to Removal by The Dow Chemical Company, filed.(Vasut, Cody) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Brazoria County District Court, case number 239 (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-31017203) filed by BrandSafway, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H)(Manning, Stephanie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.