Neisen v. City of Galveston et al
| Heather Neisen |
| City of Galveston, Officer Seth Coldiron, Officer Logan Frankland and Barbara Agbu |
| 3:2025cv00147 |
| May 14, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Jeffrey V Brown |
| Andrew M Edison |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Letter from Heather Neisen re: Proof of service delivered, filed. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (ndb3) |
| Filing 14 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Barbara Agbu served on 6/11/2025, answer due 7/2/2025; City of Galveston served on 6/11/2025, answer due 7/2/2025; Seth Coldiron served on 6/10/2025, answer due 7/1/2025, filed. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (ndb3) |
Filing 13
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Case terminated on 10/16/2025 (Signed by Judge Jeffrey V Brown) Parties notified. (gc3)
|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE to #8 Order on Motion for Entry of Default, filed by Heather Neisen. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (ndb3) |
| ***Delivery Confirmation for delivery date(s) 08/25/2025 re: 11 Document(s) Sent, filed. (agg3) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Resetting re: #3 Order for Initial Conference - FORM,. Parties notified. Initial Conference reset for 11/12/2025 at 09:00 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison, filed. (rrc3) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER denying #5 Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default. No defendant has been served. Until a defendant is served with a summons and the plaintiffs complaint, that defendant does not even know they have been sued. The court cannot enter default against a defendant that does not know about the lawsuit. Any defendant that has not been served by Friday, October 10, 2025, will be dismissed from this case. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison) Parties notified. (dm4)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Andrew M. Edison. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(b), all dispositive pretrial matters in this case are hereby referred to United States Magistrate Judge Andrew M. Edison for Report and Recommendation to this court. All trial deadlines before this court remain in effect. (Signed by Judge Jeffrey V Brown) Parties notified. (dm4)
|
| Filing 6 Letter from Heather Neisen re: How to file video with court, filed. (agg3) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Entry of Default against All Defendants by Heather Neisen, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/25/2025. (agg3) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (vp3) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 9/10/2025 at 09:00 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison. (Signed by Judge Jeffrey V Brown) Parties notified. (vp3)
|
| Filing 2 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (vp3) |
| Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Andrew M. Edison selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (vp3) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Heather Neisen. Application to Proceed IFP Granted on 5/13/2025. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (vp3) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
