Bradley v. National Guard Bureau
| Richard N Bradley |
| National Guard Bureau |
| 3:2026cv00145 |
| May 1, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Jeffrey V Brown |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Proof of Service Declaration re: #1 Complaint by Richard N Bradley, filed. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (vp3) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by National Guard Bureau, filed. (Siddiqui, Myra) |
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Continuance Answer due by 6/17/2026.(Signed by Judge Jeffrey V Brown) Parties notified. (gc3)
|
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Continuance of Responsive Pleading Deadline by National Guard Bureau, filed. Motion Docket Date 6/30/2026. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Siddiqui, Myra) |
| NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Myra Farah Siddiqui on behalf of National Guard Bureau, filed. (Siddiqui, Myra) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Galveston Division Rules of Practice by Richard N Bradley, filed. (agg3) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Richard N. Bradley, filed. (agg3) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of #1 Complaint by Richard N Bradley, filed. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (vp3) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening, with Notice Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. Party notified, filed. (vp3) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 8/12/2026 at 09:00 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison. (Signed by Judge Jeffrey V Brown) Parties notified. (vp3)
|
| Filing 3 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (vp3) |
| Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Andrew M. Edison selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (vp3) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to National Guard Bureau, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Issued summons returned to plaintiff by First-class mail, filed. (agg3) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against National Guard Bureau filed by Richard N Bradley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (agg3) |
| Filing fee: $405.00, receipt number 300000620, filed. (vp3) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bradley v. National Guard Bureau | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Richard N Bradley | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: National Guard Bureau | |
| Represented By: | Myra Farah Siddiqui |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
