Mendoza v. Omaha Property & Ca
| Anthony Mendoza and Tracy Mendoza |
| Omaha Property and Casualty Insurance Company |
| 4:2002cv03901 |
| October 15, 2002 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| David Hittner |
| Insurance |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 4001 National Insurance Flood Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2002. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER granting [7-1] stipulation of dismissal with prejudice, entered. Parties notified. ( signed by Judge David Hittner ) (ljackson)
|
| Case closed (ljackson) |
| Filing 7 STIPULATION of dismissal by Anthony Mendoza, Tracy Mendoza, Omaha Property & Ca , filed (kprice) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Omaha Property & Ca , filed. (kprice) |
| Filing 5 MEMORANDUM by Omaha Property & Ca in support of its [4-1] motion to dismiss , filed (ljackson) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to dismiss by Omaha Property & Ca, Motion Docket Date 11/11/02 [4-1] motion , filed. (ljackson) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint by Omaha Property & Ca (Added attorney ), filed. (ljackson) |
|
Filing 2
Order setting Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference on 11:30 2/14/03 before Magistrate Judge Marcia A. Crone and Order to Disclose Interested Persons, filed. () Parties notified. (bchurchill)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Omaha Property & Ca filed FILING FEE $ 150.00 RECEIPT # 524228 (bchurchill) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
