Alpert et al v. Riley et al
Case Number: 4:2004cv03774
Filed: September 28, 2004
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Houston Office
Presiding Judge: Lee H Rosenthal
Nature of Suit: Fraud or Truth-In-Lending
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 553 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION entered DENYING 552 MOTION for Reconsideration of 549 Order on Motion to Appoint. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
June 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 534 POST-JUDGMENT STIPULATION AND ORDER CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR TURNOVER RELIEF(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(gkelner, )
August 15, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 525 ORDER entered GRANTING 524 Supplemental MOTION for Attorney Fees. Plaintiffs are awarded 410,000.00 in attorney's fees, to be recovered from defendant Mark Riley. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
June 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 521 ORDER entered DENYING 498 MOTION for Attorney Fees, without prejudice to resubmission with adequate support, no later than 7/15/12. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
January 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 500 ORDER entered DENYING 499 Renewed MOTION for New Trial.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
September 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 483 ORDER entered: On August 2, 2011, this court entered a Memorandum and Order granting in part and denying in part the plaintiffs motion for entry of final judgment, (Docket Entry No. 467), and denying Rileys motion for judgment and a new trial, (Docket Entry No. 468). By October 3, 2011, the parties must file a proposed final judgment order consistent with this courts August 2 Memorandum and Order. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
August 2, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 480 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered : Rileys motion for judgment and a new trial, (Docket Entry No. 468), is denied. The plaintiffs motion for entry of judgment, (Docket Entry No. 467), is granted in part and denied in part. The motion is granted as to th e plaintiffs request that this court enter judgment against Riley and award prejudgment interest beginning180 days after May 28, 2009. The plaintiffs motion is denied as to the requests that this court award additional damages against Riley and enjoin the state probate court against interference with this courts judgment. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
February 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 447 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered : The defendants motion for summary judgment on limitations, (Docket Entries No. 361, 362), is granted in part and denied in part. The motion is granted as to the plaintiffs claims for conversion, negligence, gross negli gence, and negligent misrepresentation, and denied as to the plaintiffs claims for fraud, breach of fiduciary duties, aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duties, and the plaintiffs request for declaratory judgment. The defendants motion for summary judgment on the plaintiffs RICO claims, (Docket Entry No. 363), is granted. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
November 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 407 ORDER entered: On June 14, 2010, defendants Mark Riley and Dixie Meynier filed two motions for partial summary judgment, (Docket Entries No. 361, 363). One motion raised statute of limitations issues; the other motion raised issues related to the pl aintiffs Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1691, et seq. claims. The same day, the plaintiffs moved for partial summary judgment on several trust issues. (Docket Entry No. 366). Neither party has filed responses. Both parties now ask this court for additional time to file responses. This court grants the parties request. Responses for all three motions are due November 16, 2010. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
May 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 355 ORDER entered DENYING 334 MOTION to Modify Injunction. A hearing on those issues is set for July 15, 2010 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 11-B. Attorneys who are subject to the preliminary injunction may file briefs by June 18, 2010. Responsive briefs are due by July 9, 2010. The plaintiffs will provide a copy of this order to any attorneys who may be affected by the preliminary injunction.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
April 19, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 337 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered: Based on the evidence, the record, the parties submissions, the arguments of counsel, and the applicable law, this court holds that Riley waived any attorney-client privilege and work-product protection in the materials he had placed and left on Robert Huxs computer.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
June 19, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 238 ORDER entered setting monthly status conferences to handle discovery issues: Status Conference set for 8/10/2009 at 05:00 PM ; Status Conference set for 9/8/2009 at 05:00 PM ; Status Conference set for 10/5/2009 at 05:00 PM ; Status Conference set for 11/9/2009 at 05:00 PM; Status Conference set for 12/7/2009 at 05:00 PM in Courtroom 11B before Judge Lee H Rosenthal.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
April 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 223 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING Defts. Objections to Plaintiff's Discovery requests.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alpert et al v. Riley et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?