Trigo v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Institutional Division Officials unnamed defendants et al
4:2005cv02012 |
June 9, 2005 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Houston Office |
Lee H Rosenthal |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 124 FINAL JUDGMENT entered. This case is dismissed with prejudice. Case terminated on 1/31/11.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, ) |
Filing 122 ORDER entered amending and resetting docket control order deadlines: Joint Pretrial Order is due by 2/21/2011 and Docket Call is reset for 2/25/2011 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 11B before Judge Lee H Rosenthal.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, ) |
Filing 113 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION entered DENYING 101 MOTION to Substitute Dr. Wyatt Howell's Estate in Place of Dr. Wyatt Howell,GRANTING 96 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Talley's Motion to Dismiss, GRANTING 84 MOTION to Dismiss.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Trigo v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Institutional Division Officials unnamed defendants et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.