Jackson v. Singh et al
| 4:2006cv02920 |
| September 14, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Houston Office |
| Mary Milloy |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| P.I.: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
ORDER entered ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 60 Memorandum and Recommendations, 58 Supplemental MOTION for Summary Judgment, 27 Memorandum and Recommendations, 38 Opposed MOTION for Summary Judgment Under FRCP 56 (e)Opposed MOTION for Summary Judgment Under FRCP 56 (e), 41 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Final judgment will be entered by separate order.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
|
|
Filing
60
MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 58 Supplemental MOTION for Summary Judgment, 38 Opposed MOTION for Summary Judgment Under FRCP 56 (e)Opposed MOTION for Summary Judgment Under FRCP 56 (e), 41 MOTION for Summary Judgment Objections to M&R due by 7/2/2008.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Milloy) (Attachments: # 1 Appendix) Parties notified.(ypippin, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jackson v. Singh et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
