MED-IM Development, Inc v. GE Capital Corp
| MED-IM Development, Inc., Kingsland Open MRI, LP, CAT Scan Centre, Inc, Woodstead MRI, Inc, Fallbrook Open MRI, Inc and Cornelius R Wheeler |
| General Electric Capital Corp, General Electric Medical Systems and General Electric Healthcare Financial Services |
| Woodstead MRI, Inc, Fallbrook Open MRI, Inc, Cornelius R Wheeler, CAT Scan Centre, Inc, MED-IM Development, Inc. and Kingsland Open MRI, LP |
| General Electric Capital Corp |
| 4:2007cv01618 |
| May 11, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Houston Office |
| Montgomery |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE entered. Based on this courts memorandum and order staying the litigation between Med-IM and GECC pending the outcome of Med-IMs arbitration with GEMSIT, this case is administratively closed. It may be reinstated on this courts active docket by motion filed within 30 days after the arbitration is decided.Case terminated on 4/2/08.( Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal ) Parties notified.(leddins, )
|
|
Filing
43
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING 21 MOTION to Stay, DENYING 30 MOTION to Compel GECC to Arbitration.( Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal ) Parties notified.(leddins, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
