Hill v. New Alenco Windows, Ltd
Plaintiff: Earnestine Hill
Defendant: New Alenco Windows, Ltd
Case Number: 4:2007cv03857
Filed: November 15, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Houston Office
County: Brazoria
Presiding Judge: Keith P Ellison
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 39 Memorandum & Order GRANTING IN PART & DENYING IN PART 25 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's Motion to Strike DENIED IN PART & DENIED AS MOOT IN PART.(Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified.(csonnier, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hill v. New Alenco Windows, Ltd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Earnestine Hill
Represented By: Uchechi Okechukwu Nwakanma
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: New Alenco Windows, Ltd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?