Kim v. Time Insurance Company
| Byung Kim and Yong Kim |
| Time Insurance Company |
| 4:2007cv04201 |
| December 10, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Houston Office |
| Harris |
| Keith P Ellison |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
107
Memorandum & Order DENYING 87 Opposed Motion for Leave to File 4th Amended Complaint.(Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified.(csonnier, )
|
|
Filing
106
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYNG IN PART 67 MOTION for Summary Judgment.(Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified.(svaught)
|
|
Filing
57
Memorandum & Order DENYING 45 Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiffs' Expert Disclosures. Plaintiff required to provide Defendant with a written report in compliance with Rule 26(a)(2)(B) no later than 6/16/2008.(Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified.(csonnier, )
|
|
Filing
53
Memorandum & order GRANTING IN PART & DENYING IN PART 46 Motion for Protective Order.(Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified.(csonnier, )
|
|
Filing
41
Memorandum & Order GRANTING 32 Second Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint.( Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison ) Parties notified.(csonnier, )
|
|
Filing
25
Memorandum & Order GRANTING 19 MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's Jury Demand.( Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison ) Parties notified.(csonnier, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
