Hall v. Quarterman
Petitioner: Berthenia Williams Hall
Respondent: Nathaniel Quarterman
Case Number: 4:2008cv01298
Filed: April 29, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Coryell
Presiding Judge: Gray H. Miller
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 6 MOTION for Summary Judgment with Brief in Support; DISMISSING this case with prejudice. Any and all pending motions are DENIED as moot. A certificate of appealiability is DENIED. (Signed by Judge Gray H. Miller) Parties notified.(rkonieczny)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hall v. Quarterman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Berthenia Williams Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Nathaniel Quarterman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?